The Health Dangers of Genetically Modified Foods

formatus asked:


This is a lecture by Jeffrey Smith, in which he summarizes the contents of this book. It's not only informative, but amusing, because he casts a joke here and there. Part 2 at www.youtube.com

25 комментариев to “The Health Dangers of Genetically Modified Foods”

  1. jprahhal:

    i really wish more people cared but they just dont, and it is very frustrating.

  2. Mrludwig01:

    antiboitics are making you dependent on pharma drugs. there also wasnt flouride in the water back then. they werent poisoning us with chem trails, and they didnt have shitty gmo foods to make them more sick. so all in all i would say the four horsemen are drawing nearer... corporations paying off govt to make you dependent on there products just for profits. RESEARCH: New World Order check out my favorites for more info

  3. gladiator1010:

    The problem is you say «most people»...all that means is the info is being pumped through our mainstream media...that has no indication of the quality of the information.

    «most people» is an assumption. I try not to make assupmtions especially because in the end «most people» end up being completely wrong.

    The opinions of the masses are consistently misled

    «most people» never read their mortgages before signing either like 99.99% of them didn't

  4. B4IRUTUARU16:

    ignorant? i admitted that there may be problems with this new technology however you are so close minded that you wont admit that there could be any positive contributions to humanity through new growing technologies.

    people like you will never «go away» because people like you are obstacles in front of science slowing down the process of technological advancement

  5. B4IRUTUARU16:

    sorry some of the sentences you put together i didn't understand

    my world is not perfect in fact we are all living in the same reality where there are more problems than benefits. however it is through science we can improve human life and how we interact with the natural world.

  6. Reggieworth:

    «Life expectancy 'back then» needs to be a little more specific"

    life expectancy & maximum life are 2 different statistics. its been shown that while there were people who lived 100 years back then, the average age was as B4IRU stated

    the increase in average age is due to medicine & cus we dont have to work as physically

    «only large corporations like Monsanto saw this stuff as beneficial»

    like any good spin doctors, they have convinced the uneducated that it has benefits other than profits

  7. gladiator1010:

    They had to travel for miles in the rain and snow with now automobile

    Are you saying a real western cowboy 150 years ago would be in worse health than the average has-to-use-a-wheelchair-to-get-around-because- they-are-so-overweight-american?

    I don't believe you

  8. gladiator1010:

    Life expectancy 'back then" needs to be a little more specific and if you look at the bible as public record, towards the beginning of creation man lived for hundreds of years.

    There is documented proof of men in China living hundreds of years...even until recently.

    So that is the most ignorant statement you could make... back then they used to throw their feeces in the street.

    They used to burn wood in their homes which caused health issues.

    Lack of medicine, slave labor etc etc etc

  9. gladiator1010:

    I guess I am a little frustrated that people are really this ignorant.

    I thought only large corporations like Monsanto saw this stuff as beneficial.

    What am I trying to prove, I am trying to stay alive in a world that does everything to not allow that to happen

    I am so glad that your world is perfect and everything is wonderful. Unfortunately, you are not the only one here, and if this is a problem it is not going away...and neither are people like myself

  10. B4IRUTUARU16:

    @gladiator1010 lol nourishing our bodies for thousands of years. don't forget the life expectancy back then was 30-40 :) some great nutritional food they had back then.

    there is a difference between food products and then sun Einstein.

    "really? «really?» what are you trying to prove? wheres your evidence? sounds like your desperate for attention.

    actually its through education i appreciate the modern world and the technological advancements that keeps me healthy and alive

  11. Reggieworth:

    «They passed a law, troll.»

    so you are claimiing that because the law was passed a danger to pedestrians was proven?

    «gather the courage to discuss the video»

    lol TROLL, have you done so? i doubt you posess the mental capacity to discuss this incident much less like an adult

    find a new hobby loser

  12. gladiator1010:

    I mean, you can't really frame the entire arguement in terms of...it's either GM or DEATH for everyone. Food is just not good enough the way nature provides it.

    Give me a break!

    That is a complete lie...you should not have gone to school. It hasn't done anyone any benefit.

    In fact, the school system is in a large part to blame for the direction of our society, so I wouldn't be too proud about «attending»

  13. gladiator1010:

    That is totally close-minded...to believe we are going backwards in time by preserving what has intuitively been nourishing our bodies for thousands upon thousands upon thousands of years.

    Yeah...I just decided I'm going to live without the sun and water...they are so like caveman stuff...we don't need the sun now...we have heaters and stuff, and we don't need any water we have gatorade.

    Really?

    Really?

    Has your education washed away your brain?

  14. gladiator1010:

    No need to apologize for anyone.

    I am strong-willed beyond belief and am not too concerned, my aim is at the truth, if he gets me closer to it then I will listen, if not then my ears are closed...plus most people who meet me always walk away a slightly different person.

    But truthfully I believe it really doesn't matter what he «was» only who he «is»

    I enjoy the fact that every moment is a new chance to re-invent yourself

    But I do appreciate the kind thought of giving a heads up :)

  15. Reggieworth:

    «Reggieworth here has stated that he make specific accounts to harass people with. he also announced he is here to? attack people until they leave.»

    isnt that what you have done & are doing here?

    when you gather the courage & have an adult help you with a biology book i will be waiting for your views on this matter

    otherwise, find a new hobby. you **** at this

  16. TrollMonitor:

    Sorry about the stalker/troll named Reggieworth. He is pissed because he was exposed as a cop hating bigot and stalker.

    Reggieworth here has stated that he make specific accounts to harass people with. he also announced he is here to attack people until they leave.

  17. TrollMonitor:

    «prove it»

    They passed a law, troll.

    When you gather the courage to discuss the video you are welcome to join the adults in the conversation. Got it, troll? Now stop fear mongering, hypocrite.

  18. Reggieworth:

    «not even on the same planet»

    thanks gladman... sorry about my STALKER/TROLL hes been obsessedwith me ever since i exposed his **** group for harassing skateboarder kids

    the guy isnt smart enough to join this discussion so he just whines about me

    look how he dosent even understand that his accusation actually supports my case not his

    «If it was actually stoppping hunger in the world, that would be one thing, but I don't see that changing at all»

    seconded. world hunger is due to greed alone

  19. Reggieworth:

    «a danger to pedestrians»

    prove it Loser

    then show where laws have been made based on what ive said, or if i have reccomended there should be

    when you gather the courage to discuss the video here you are welcome to join the conversation

    «thebatman101069

    a troll is someone who posts controversial, inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages...with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion»

    find a new hobby

  20. gladiator1010:

    Well if they succeed, I know one person that doesn't need science to know full well that it will result in death.

    I cannot eat gm foods...it has nearly cost me my life once.

    The only reason I am still alive today is because of my access to healthy, organic food...I can live without mostly everything else. This is the one thing I cannot live without.

    If it was actually stoppping hunger in the world, that would be one thing, but I don't see that changing at all

    Merry Christmas!

  21. gladiator1010:

    Skating on the sidewalk and potentially destroying our source of life are completely different dangers...not even on the same planet.

    You are not fear mongering when asking people to stop and think about what they are doing...in fact, reacting to fear is the opposite of that.

    It is out of our fear of poverty that we are bringing this curse upon mankind.

    If we stopped living in fear and instead lived in abundance-love-health-joy, I could much more readily trust the wisdom of our system

  22. gladiator1010:

    Yes...the "intellectuals'

    Like the ones in the US that said «housing prices always go up»

    «this is the best time to buy stock»

    "we will never run into problems with the dollar'

    You mean «those» intellectuals?

    Really?

    Plus, one can look also at the India-farmer-gm-cotton-Monsanto-scandal among many others to see that the simple claim that these technologies are beneficial all around is completely false

    They don't even live up to their promise-expectation

  23. TrollMonitor:

    «people balance the benefits against the dangers. right now the public perception is that its dangerous»

    Just like the community of Hot Springs find skating on sidewalks a danger to pedestrians, but using your logic that would be fear mongering.

  24. B4IRUTUARU16:

    well the health administry and food department of australia look at these issues throughly to see all the possible risk short and long term effects. im not sure about the U.S however i am for genetically modified food and im sure your against the idea. i do beileve in some circumstances that companies shouldnt be allowed to sell GM food to consumers without enough long term effect evidence. not until the technology is perfected :) its 12:47am christmas day in australia. merry christmas :)

  25. Reggieworth:

    «most people are to ignorant and scared to see the benifits»

    people balance the benefits against the dangers. right now the public perception is that its dangerous

    if the corporations like monsanto that control it acted more honourably. perhaps people would trust em

    «once it gets spread around it is either GM or GM»

    hes right. theres no going back. we could really fk ourselves over bigtime

    prove that its safe, not prove that its toxic

Leave a Reply