Health Care, The «Patriot» Act & the U.S. Constitution
SchiffReport asked:
also check me out on www.facebook.com and twitter.com
also check me out on www.facebook.com and twitter.com
25 комментариев to “Health Care, The «Patriot» Act & the U.S. Constitution”
Leave a Reply
Additional Articles From "News"
- Thank You For Shopping For Along With Mulberry Tote
- the weight loss products tell pavilion is obesity Hoodia P57 super dimension of the terminator
- Among diet pills that work wonders is the most popular P57 Hoodia
- The most magical effect reducing weight of the super p57
- The most reliable products reducing weight of course is super p57
- P57 significant effect reducing weight I saw that their beauty
- Health effective weight loss make you more beautiful
- The apple company and Ms are in hot water over claimed cost gouging down under
- Super hoodia p57 natural fiber more thin is more beautiful
- Super P57 healthy and rapid weight loss is real and effective
Sorry folks, you have been had, peed on, scammed and lied to.
WallStreet is rigged and bailouts a fraud, market manipulations,
high freqency trading, flash orders, ***** short selling, on and on
Goldman and Govt are in bed, they set the rules to benefit the few
Jobs been exported, your labor devalued to Zero to ***** you into debt
Get ready, walk away from your CC cards and mortgage. FICO scores are a
scam to enslave you and keep you in debt. Break away don't be a sheeple
Protect Yourself
Keller13, if you don't like what Mr. Schiff is saying, than why are you watching his videos. Go somewhere else and complain, you moron.
This guy talks a big talk. he says he is against what our government is doing, but he is going along with it just the same. As far as I am concerned, he is just as much part of the problem. He should say «no».
Sure it does that, but that's not the problem. The problem is we are a country about freedom, we are a country where we have established a check and balance system of 3 seperate pieces of government, yet the Patriot act has no check and balance. We are simply expected to believe it will not be abused. Even if those in power would not abuse such authority, there is no guarantee the next group of people in office wouldn't.
Peter Schiff 2010!!!
Exactly and that doesn't sound like efficiency to me. It probably also won't work. Technology can be outsmarted by other technology and so on. Computers shouldn't be administering security, people should. After all, shouldn't people keep other people safe if that's their jobs?
He was flagged past security by apparently some member of local intelligence. He did not go through the normal security checks nor did he have a passport. But now we all have to get digitally strip searched and recorded in the buff for this false flag psy-op disguised as a terror attack
Then how did the «Christmas Day Bomber» get explosives onto a plane?
I can move my tounge like a snake!
USA PATRIOT act = Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001
I understand how it works. My point is why do something that clearly is not constitutional and unlikly to be upheld by the court. You are condoning just do it, hope it is never challenged. The constitution is an exceptional document that recognizes individual rights and allows us to live in a way few in the HX of mankind have been allowed to. You are condoning creative ways to get around or ignore it to get a liberal agenda passed. Aspects of health care will get challenged, we will see then
I see this is conversation is degrading down to insulting comments. Thats disappointing. You have a systemic misunderstanding of our legal/constitutional system. Being called foolish by a fool means less than nothing. Tell the Supreme Court your opinion, they might care more than I do. Good Bye
LOL No, I like freedom and everytime these clowns pass a new law I lose some freedom. They need to follow the constitution, use it as a guideline as it was intended. Let the court decide things that are unclear. They are not doing that. They are doing whatever they want, then saying prove it's not allowed. That is not a responsable way to do things but that is the only way libs get radical things done. You are coming from the same position and its kinda funny, you look foolish with that position
Now it sounds like you dislike freedom and the rule of law. Youre starting to sound preachy and incredibly hypocritical. Youre acting like you have an encyclopedic knowledge of the law and Im sure you dont. And those are your words about the constitution, not mine. Youre the one claiming healthcare is unconstitutional, the burden of proof is on you. You can have your opinion but guess what? It means nothing, but the Supreme Courts does. And Im good with that. Your logic is weak.
So basically you are condoning do whatever you want until you get caught and told it's not allowed? Pretend the constitution does not exist until the supreme court officially says something is not constitutional. That is kinda crazy.
I do not agree
The thing is, the constitution is fairly simple in what its guidelines are. There are areas that are unclear, which it is the role of the courts to decide. Our current polititions are ignoring those guidelines even in areas where it is painfully clear what the spirit of the constitution means. It is like breaking a law that is painfully clear and saying, I will keep doing it until a judge tells me it's illegal. The polititions need to follow the clear guidelines, let the court decide the unclear
Respectfully, I disagree. Your example completely ignores the role of law enforcement. The constitutionality of any rule or law is uncertain until its challenged. I would rather have experienced judges, well versed in constitutional law decide if healthcare is constitutional or not, not this guy, not me, or you for that matter. Your free to have your opinion, just dont try to govern me with it.
DIRECT TV will rip you off. BEWARE BEWARE BEWARE BEWARE BEWARE BEWARE BEWARE BEWARE BEWARE BEWARE BEWARE BEWARE BEWARE BEWARE BEWARE BEWARE BEWARE
btc8182: Excuse me, that is like saying you are just going to walk around doing whatever you want because you are not qualified to understand the law. Get real, the supreme court is there for things that are not clear. Most things are clear if it's constitutional or not.
The administration is doing whatever they want, they know it's not constitutional. Its like driving 110 in a 55 zone for half an hour. We all know what 55MPH means and 110 is not allowed, even if its just for for 30 min.
Who are you to make these claims about healthcare? Isnt that a check and balance that belongs to the judiciary? The Supreme Court decides what unconstitutional or not, not the President, Congress, or you. Know your role.
@juliaisafilmbuff123
«hate and fear» the government more like not trust because the constitution apparently means nothing. The document does not protect itself.
Yes there is a problem with business and financers because they have the means (tons of money) to make thier voice heard. That said the people generally get the government they deserve — stated as a function of their overall participation and ability to judge their leaders charcter and hold them accountable.
@juliaisafilmbuff123
I have paid over $300,000 to Social Security and Medicare. I have «not» collected a penny and Politicians tell me there is no money left????
Politicians regulate businesses.
Politicians ARE the problem!
I think it's sad that so many Americans won't support universal health care because they **** and fear the government so much. I'm more afraid of businesses trying to cash out on me than I am of the gov., since I have the opportunity to make a change to the government but I can't with for-profit businesses.
yeah, the richest people in the world, the bankers, do exactly and only that. Yes it is amazing and sad.